那如果他们没过18岁,
我们把他们眼睛喷瞎了,要负责人吗?作者: Mao 时间: 2009-8-2 19:17
狗屁建议作者: Caoyan 时间: 2009-8-2 19:50
除非遇到生命威胁,否则伤害别人眼睛不是太歹毒了?
将心比心,哪家的孩子不是妈生的。作者: 01101109 时间: 2009-8-2 20:16
de rao ren chu qie rao ren ,yao shi chuo yan rong yi zhi can作者: M0139184 时间: 2009-8-2 20:20
007你太凶了::zt60::作者: nathanxu 时间: 2009-8-2 20:35
In Tasmania, you will be in serious trouble if you going to poke someone's eye out with your keys. You can only do that when your life is under serious threat.
In Tasmania, you can alway claim s46 Self-defence. However, there are 2 limb under the defence, that is the subjective and objective test.
I think you are too extreme there if you attempt to poke someone's eye out, I would not recommend you do that.作者: nathanxu 时间: 2009-8-2 20:38
That incorrect, people under 18 years of ages also have criminal responsibility and it does not look good on his record. He could also spend sometime behind bars. I've been to Risdon prison (on tour as a new lawyer), I think from my experience, some under 18 offenders were also there. You don't want to be there...作者: shi007 时间: 2009-8-3 23:38
shi qing mei fa sheng zai ni shen shang作者: 我是谁 时间: 2009-8-4 03:08
兰州的经验确实像自己所说的,有点纸上谈兵,个人认为并不可取,主要是尺度太不好把握。不过相信每个看过的人应该都会有自己的判断,未必会依照此方法去做。同时mao的回复多少有点不太合适吧,即使强烈反对也不妨换种表达方式么。